Background: Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) is currently considered the therapy of choice for complicated type B acute aortic dissection (TBAAD). Although several papers have reported good outcomes at short- and medium-term follow-up, some questions still remain regarding the long-term durability and re-intervention rate during follow-up. Methods: We describe a case of a patient originally treated with TEVAR for TBAAD complicated by impending aortic rupture. Results: Endovascular repair successfully excluded the flow through the primary entry tear but during the 12-year follow-up period the patient experienced several complications and re-interventions. Various full-size three-dimensional (3D) models of the patient-specific vasculature were printed to better explain the different interventional interventions over the 12 years of follow-up and as a hands-on tool for medical education. Conclusions: The present case report, involving long-term follow-up, provides an example of the effectiveness and the safety of TEVAR for the treatment of complicated TBAAD shown at short and medium-term follow-up. However, the long-term complications that were observed in this patient during follow-up support the importance of lifelong CTA surveillance. Furthermore, this study confirms the capability of 3D printing technology as a powerful tool to support communication with patients and residents’ education through the physical analysis of the real cases.
Twelve-year Follow-up Post–Thoracic Endovascular Repair in Type B Aortic Dissection Shown by Three-dimensional Printing
Finotello, Alice;Pane, Bianca;Gazzola, Valerio;Mambrini, Simone;Palombo, Domenico;Spinella, Giovanni
2018-01-01
Abstract
Background: Thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) is currently considered the therapy of choice for complicated type B acute aortic dissection (TBAAD). Although several papers have reported good outcomes at short- and medium-term follow-up, some questions still remain regarding the long-term durability and re-intervention rate during follow-up. Methods: We describe a case of a patient originally treated with TEVAR for TBAAD complicated by impending aortic rupture. Results: Endovascular repair successfully excluded the flow through the primary entry tear but during the 12-year follow-up period the patient experienced several complications and re-interventions. Various full-size three-dimensional (3D) models of the patient-specific vasculature were printed to better explain the different interventional interventions over the 12 years of follow-up and as a hands-on tool for medical education. Conclusions: The present case report, involving long-term follow-up, provides an example of the effectiveness and the safety of TEVAR for the treatment of complicated TBAAD shown at short and medium-term follow-up. However, the long-term complications that were observed in this patient during follow-up support the importance of lifelong CTA surveillance. Furthermore, this study confirms the capability of 3D printing technology as a powerful tool to support communication with patients and residents’ education through the physical analysis of the real cases.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.