In Interactive Justice, Ceva claims that in circumstances of intractable value conflict justice requires the application of the ‘adversary argumentation principle’ (AAP), which mandates that each side of the conflict should be heard. I raise two qualms about AAP. The first concerns its effects on deep pluralism within a liberal society. The second concerns its unfair treatment of oppressed minorities

Interactive justice, pluralism and oppression

ottonelli valeria
2018

Abstract

In Interactive Justice, Ceva claims that in circumstances of intractable value conflict justice requires the application of the ‘adversary argumentation principle’ (AAP), which mandates that each side of the conflict should be heard. I raise two qualms about AAP. The first concerns its effects on deep pluralism within a liberal society. The second concerns its unfair treatment of oppressed minorities
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11567/919568
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact