Influenza has many age-dependent characteristics. A previous systematic review of randomized controlled trials showed that the detection rate of influenza B was higher in children than in non-elderly adults. However, no comprehensive reviews have targeted the elderly, who carry the main burden of disease. We aimed to quantify the relative detection rates of virus types A and B among the elderly, to identify factors affecting these proportions, and to compare type distribution among seniors and younger age-classes. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify multiseason studies reporting A and B virus type distributions in the elderly. A random-effects meta-analysis was planned to quantify the prevalence of type B among elderly subjects with laboratory-confirmed influenza. Meta-regression was then applied to explain the sources of heterogeneity. Across 27 estimates identified, the type B detection rate among seniors varied from 5% to 37%. Meta-analysis was not feasible owing to high heterogeneity (I2 = 98.5%). Meta-regression analysis showed that study characteristics, such as number of seasons included, hemisphere, and setting, could have contributed to the heterogeneity observed. The final adjusted model showed that studies that included both outpatients and inpatients reported a significantly (P = .024) lower proportion than those involving outpatients only. The detection rate of type B among the elderly was generally lower than in children/adolescents, but not non-elderly adults. Influenza virus type B has a relatively low detection rate in older adults, especially in settings covering both inpatients and outpatients. Public health implications are discussed.

Heterogeneous estimates of influenza virus types A and B in the elderly: Results of a meta-regression analysis

Panatto, Donatella;Signori, Alessio;Lai, Piero L;Gasparini, Roberto;Amicizia, Daniela
2018-01-01

Abstract

Influenza has many age-dependent characteristics. A previous systematic review of randomized controlled trials showed that the detection rate of influenza B was higher in children than in non-elderly adults. However, no comprehensive reviews have targeted the elderly, who carry the main burden of disease. We aimed to quantify the relative detection rates of virus types A and B among the elderly, to identify factors affecting these proportions, and to compare type distribution among seniors and younger age-classes. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify multiseason studies reporting A and B virus type distributions in the elderly. A random-effects meta-analysis was planned to quantify the prevalence of type B among elderly subjects with laboratory-confirmed influenza. Meta-regression was then applied to explain the sources of heterogeneity. Across 27 estimates identified, the type B detection rate among seniors varied from 5% to 37%. Meta-analysis was not feasible owing to high heterogeneity (I2 = 98.5%). Meta-regression analysis showed that study characteristics, such as number of seasons included, hemisphere, and setting, could have contributed to the heterogeneity observed. The final adjusted model showed that studies that included both outpatients and inpatients reported a significantly (P = .024) lower proportion than those involving outpatients only. The detection rate of type B among the elderly was generally lower than in children/adolescents, but not non-elderly adults. Influenza virus type B has a relatively low detection rate in older adults, especially in settings covering both inpatients and outpatients. Public health implications are discussed.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Panatto_et_al-2018-Influenza_and_Other_Respiratory_Viruses.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 482.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
482.87 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/900500
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact