Although there is a wide range of tools to assess infant and adult attachment, a «measuring gap» has been identified in middle childhood and early adolescence. This article documents the Italian psychometric properties of the Child Attachment Interview (CAI), a semi-structured interview developed from Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) and Strange Situation Procedure (SSP). The main psychometric properties are presented: interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, concurrent and discriminant validities. Findings suggest that the CAI Italian version is a reliable and valid measure for assessing attachment in this developmental period and discriminates the attachment of normally developing children and those with psychopathology

La Child Attachment Interview: un’indagine psicometrica su un campione italiano.

Cavanna Donatella;Bizzi Fabiola;Castellano Rosetta
2018-01-01

Abstract

Although there is a wide range of tools to assess infant and adult attachment, a «measuring gap» has been identified in middle childhood and early adolescence. This article documents the Italian psychometric properties of the Child Attachment Interview (CAI), a semi-structured interview developed from Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) and Strange Situation Procedure (SSP). The main psychometric properties are presented: interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, concurrent and discriminant validities. Findings suggest that the CAI Italian version is a reliable and valid measure for assessing attachment in this developmental period and discriminates the attachment of normally developing children and those with psychopathology
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2. PCS Cavanna et al., 2018.pdf

Open Access dal 02/10/2020

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Dimensione 525.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
525.42 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/897338
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact