Previous experimental data of xylose-to-xylitol bioconversion by Debaryomyces hansenii carried out according to a 33 full factorial design were used to model this process by two different artificial neural network (ANN) training methods. Models obtained for four responses were compared with those of response surface methodology (RSM). ANN models were shown to be superior to RSM in the predictive capacity, whereas the latter showed better performance in the generalization capability step. RSM with optimization using a genetic algorithm was revealed as a whole to be the best modeling option, which suggests that the comparative performances of RSM and ANN may be a highly problem-specific issue.

Comparison of Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network for Modeling Xylose-to-Xylitol Bioconversion

CASAZZA, ALESSANDRO ALBERTO;CONVERTI, ATTILIO
2017-01-01

Abstract

Previous experimental data of xylose-to-xylitol bioconversion by Debaryomyces hansenii carried out according to a 33 full factorial design were used to model this process by two different artificial neural network (ANN) training methods. Models obtained for four responses were compared with those of response surface methodology (RSM). ANN models were shown to be superior to RSM in the predictive capacity, whereas the latter showed better performance in the generalization capability step. RSM with optimization using a genetic algorithm was revealed as a whole to be the best modeling option, which suggests that the comparative performances of RSM and ANN may be a highly problem-specific issue.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
A288.pdf

accesso chiuso

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 238.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
238.55 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/858293
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact