THE TRADITION OF HANS VON GERSDORFF’S ‘FELDTBUCH DER WUNDARZNEY’: THE COPENHAGEN MANUSCRIPT GKS 1663 4TO AND ITS RELATION TO THE PRINTED VERSIONS. The surgical handbook known as Feldtbuch der Wundarzney by the Strasburgian field surgeon Johannes (Hans) von Gersdorff is one of the first medical texts printed in the High German language area. During the Early Modern Age this text enjoyed great popularity as witnessed by the high number of editions which followed the first one: eleven or twelve in quarto and three or four in folio in a timespan running from 1526 to 1606. The Feldtbuch was also translated into Dutch (1591, 1593, 1605 and 1622) and probably into Latin. While the printed tradition of the surgical handbook has been repeatedly taken into consideration by scholars, less attention has been paid to its manuscript tradition. Fragments of von Gersdorff’s work can be found in four late manuscript collections of medical and surgical texts: Lucerne, Zentral- und Hochschulbibliothek, KB Pp 27 4to, Kassel, Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek, 8vo Ms. med. 6, Copenhagen, Kongelige Bibliotek, Thott 253 8vo and Copenhagen, Kongelige Bibliotek, GKS 1663 4to. This last is particularly interesting for the study of the text tradition and circulation in Europe, because it contains a large portion of a Low German version of the surgical handbook. The aim of this study is to examine Copenhagen GKS 1663 4to and to compare it with the High German and Dutch printed versions of the Feldtbuch in order to identify the source of the Low German translation contained in the manuscript. Special attention is paid to the structure of the fragment and to the possible reasons which could have motivated the selection of the portions of text transcribed in Copenhagen GKS 1663 4to.

Zur Überlieferung von Hans von Gersdorffs Feldtbuch der Wundarzney: Die Handschrift Kopenhagen GKS 1663 4tound ihr Verhältnis zu den Druckfassungen

BENATI, CHIARA
2014-01-01

Abstract

THE TRADITION OF HANS VON GERSDORFF’S ‘FELDTBUCH DER WUNDARZNEY’: THE COPENHAGEN MANUSCRIPT GKS 1663 4TO AND ITS RELATION TO THE PRINTED VERSIONS. The surgical handbook known as Feldtbuch der Wundarzney by the Strasburgian field surgeon Johannes (Hans) von Gersdorff is one of the first medical texts printed in the High German language area. During the Early Modern Age this text enjoyed great popularity as witnessed by the high number of editions which followed the first one: eleven or twelve in quarto and three or four in folio in a timespan running from 1526 to 1606. The Feldtbuch was also translated into Dutch (1591, 1593, 1605 and 1622) and probably into Latin. While the printed tradition of the surgical handbook has been repeatedly taken into consideration by scholars, less attention has been paid to its manuscript tradition. Fragments of von Gersdorff’s work can be found in four late manuscript collections of medical and surgical texts: Lucerne, Zentral- und Hochschulbibliothek, KB Pp 27 4to, Kassel, Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek, 8vo Ms. med. 6, Copenhagen, Kongelige Bibliotek, Thott 253 8vo and Copenhagen, Kongelige Bibliotek, GKS 1663 4to. This last is particularly interesting for the study of the text tradition and circulation in Europe, because it contains a large portion of a Low German version of the surgical handbook. The aim of this study is to examine Copenhagen GKS 1663 4to and to compare it with the High German and Dutch printed versions of the Feldtbuch in order to identify the source of the Low German translation contained in the manuscript. Special attention is paid to the structure of the fragment and to the possible reasons which could have motivated the selection of the portions of text transcribed in Copenhagen GKS 1663 4to.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/800399
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact