The prognostic relevance of estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression in endometrioid endometrial cancer is still controversially discussed. The present study has focused on the evaluation of the prognostic value of ER alpha, ER beta 1, ER beta 2, and PR in this histotype. Specifically, we were interested in evaluating whether the relative level of ER subtype-specific expression (in terms of a ratio ER alpha/ER beta 1 and ER alpha/ER beta 2) would predict clinical outcome better than their absolute levels in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer. To this end, protein content was assessed by immunohistochemistry in a group of 121 cases and staining was analyzed in relation to clinicopathologic variables, disease-free survival and overall survival. Results obtained have demonstrated that none of the biological markers analyzed possess an independent prognostic role with regard to disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis of overall survival has shown that ER alpha alone is not an independent prognostic indicator in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer (hazard ratio [HR]; 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-3.0; P = .5). On the other hand, an ER alpha/ER beta 1 ratio of 1 or less or an ER alpha/ER beta 2 ratio of 1 or less has proved to be independently associated with a higher risk of death (HR, 6.4 [95% CI, 1.0-40.6; P = .04] and 9.7 [95% CI, 1.1-85.3; P = .04], respectively) along with age, tumor stage, and Ki-67. In conclusion, we report here that the ER alpha/ER beta 1 and ER alpha/ER beta 2 expression ratios are independent prognostic markers of survival in endometrioid endometrial cancer; these findings suggest that phenotyping these interacting markers conjointly may better predict patient survival than each individual marker alone.

The expression ratios of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) to estrogen receptor beta1 (ERbeta1) and ERalpha to ERbeta2 identify poor clinical outcome in endometrioid endometrial cancer.

VELLONE, VALERIO GAETANO;
2013

Abstract

The prognostic relevance of estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression in endometrioid endometrial cancer is still controversially discussed. The present study has focused on the evaluation of the prognostic value of ER alpha, ER beta 1, ER beta 2, and PR in this histotype. Specifically, we were interested in evaluating whether the relative level of ER subtype-specific expression (in terms of a ratio ER alpha/ER beta 1 and ER alpha/ER beta 2) would predict clinical outcome better than their absolute levels in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer. To this end, protein content was assessed by immunohistochemistry in a group of 121 cases and staining was analyzed in relation to clinicopathologic variables, disease-free survival and overall survival. Results obtained have demonstrated that none of the biological markers analyzed possess an independent prognostic role with regard to disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis of overall survival has shown that ER alpha alone is not an independent prognostic indicator in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer (hazard ratio [HR]; 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-3.0; P = .5). On the other hand, an ER alpha/ER beta 1 ratio of 1 or less or an ER alpha/ER beta 2 ratio of 1 or less has proved to be independently associated with a higher risk of death (HR, 6.4 [95% CI, 1.0-40.6; P = .04] and 9.7 [95% CI, 1.1-85.3; P = .04], respectively) along with age, tumor stage, and Ki-67. In conclusion, we report here that the ER alpha/ER beta 1 and ER alpha/ER beta 2 expression ratios are independent prognostic markers of survival in endometrioid endometrial cancer; these findings suggest that phenotyping these interacting markers conjointly may better predict patient survival than each individual marker alone.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11567/747823
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
social impact