With the pronouncement under comment, the Constitutional Court declared the constitutional illegitimacy of Article 629 of the Criminal Code in the part where an "ad hoc" circumstantial hypothesis is not provided for, capable of giving prominence in the judicial commensuration phase of the punishment to minor facts. The assessment of the reasonableness and proportionality of the penalty treatment is carried out through an innovative interpretation of the norm identified as "tertium comparationis"
La proporzionalità del minimo edittale dell'estorsione: una trasfigurazione del tertium comparationis (Nota a sentenza Corte costituzionale 15 giugno 2023, n. 120)
Annamaria Peccioli
2023-01-01
Abstract
With the pronouncement under comment, the Constitutional Court declared the constitutional illegitimacy of Article 629 of the Criminal Code in the part where an "ad hoc" circumstantial hypothesis is not provided for, capable of giving prominence in the judicial commensuration phase of the punishment to minor facts. The assessment of the reasonableness and proportionality of the penalty treatment is carried out through an innovative interpretation of the norm identified as "tertium comparationis"
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
fileproporzionalità.pdf
accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione
78.61 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
78.61 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
