In the decision under exam, Italian supreme Court confirmed the complicity in the robbery of the person who - acting as a "basist" - had offered hospitality and had supported the perpetrators, by providing them with logistical support before and during the commission of the crime. The persistent critical issues arising from an over-hasty assessment of accomplice liability has been highlighted by the questionable motivational line followed by the Court. Proceeding in this way, the risk of undermining respect for essential guarantee principles of Italian criminal law - such as that of the personality of criminal liability - is very high.
Concorso del basista nel reato di rapina. L’incontrollabile vis expansiva del perimetro di tipicità dell’art. 110 c.p. nel diritto vivente. (Nota a sentenza Corte suprema di Cassazione penale sezione II 25 febbraio 2022, n. 6890)
ponteprino
2022-01-01
Abstract
In the decision under exam, Italian supreme Court confirmed the complicity in the robbery of the person who - acting as a "basist" - had offered hospitality and had supported the perpetrators, by providing them with logistical support before and during the commission of the crime. The persistent critical issues arising from an over-hasty assessment of accomplice liability has been highlighted by the questionable motivational line followed by the Court. Proceeding in this way, the risk of undermining respect for essential guarantee principles of Italian criminal law - such as that of the personality of criminal liability - is very high.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Ponteprino_concorso_dpp2022.pdf
accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione
120.08 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
120.08 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.