The essay takes its cue from an interesting order of the Court of Justice that declared inadmissible a request for a preliminary ruling made by an Italian Justice of the Peace. After analyzing the Luxembourg Court’s decision and the useful indications that can be derived from it on a procedural level, it dwells on the underlying substantive issues. In addition, drawing inspiration from the extensive reasoning of the Italian judge’s application and using it as an example, some more general reflections are developed on some of the “evils” of our times and on some possible solutions.
Riflessioni di inizio anno tra tutela della salute, organizzazione e funzionamento della giustizia e garanzia dei diritti e principi fondamentali (a partire da una questione pregiudiziale sollevata, in parallelo a una questione di costituzionalità, da un Giudice di pace italiano)
Vincenzo Sciarabba
2021-01-01
Abstract
The essay takes its cue from an interesting order of the Court of Justice that declared inadmissible a request for a preliminary ruling made by an Italian Justice of the Peace. After analyzing the Luxembourg Court’s decision and the useful indications that can be derived from it on a procedural level, it dwells on the underlying substantive issues. In addition, drawing inspiration from the extensive reasoning of the Italian judge’s application and using it as an example, some more general reflections are developed on some of the “evils” of our times and on some possible solutions.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
sciarabba4.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione
921.69 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
921.69 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.