The paper focuses on the different means that several legal orders has implemented about the promotion of vaccines, especialli after the growth of the anti-vaccine movement. A special attention is devoted to the role of sanctions, highlighting all the difficulties which arise from the balance between personal autonomy and public interest. The essay suggests that coercitive tools are not always the best way to enlarge the herd immunity, whereas persuasive instruments could better achieve the goal. In consdieration of the issues signalled in this paper it is possibile to assert that a well-balanced between coercitives and persuasive measures could be attainted through a deep consideration of precautionary principle, science and adequate dissemination of information.
Politiche vaccinali, sanzioni ed esenzioni. Riflessioni di diritto comparato
Eleonora Ceccherini
2019-01-01
Abstract
The paper focuses on the different means that several legal orders has implemented about the promotion of vaccines, especialli after the growth of the anti-vaccine movement. A special attention is devoted to the role of sanctions, highlighting all the difficulties which arise from the balance between personal autonomy and public interest. The essay suggests that coercitive tools are not always the best way to enlarge the herd immunity, whereas persuasive instruments could better achieve the goal. In consdieration of the issues signalled in this paper it is possibile to assert that a well-balanced between coercitives and persuasive measures could be attainted through a deep consideration of precautionary principle, science and adequate dissemination of information.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CeccheriniRodriquezvaccini.pdf
accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione
490.46 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
490.46 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.