Purpose: Focal pattern in multiple myeloma (MM) seems to be related to poorer survival and differentiation from diffuse to focal pattern on computed tomography (CT) has inter-reader variability. We postulated that a Radiomic approach could help radiologists in differentiating diffuse from focal patterns on CT. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed imaging data of 70 patients with MM with CT, PET-CT or MRI available before bone marrow transplant. Two general radiologist evaluated, in consensus, CT images to define a focal (at least one lytic lesion >5 mm in diameter) or a diffuse (lesions <5 mm, not osteoporosis) pattern. N = 104 Radiomics features were extracted and evaluated with an open source software. Results: The pathological group included: 22 diffuse and 39 focal patterns. After feature reduction, 9 features were different (p < 0.05) in the diffuse and focal patterns (n = 2/9 features were Shape-based: MajorAxisLength and Sphericity; n = 7/9 were Gray Level Run Length Matrix (Glrlm)). AUC of the Radiologists versus Reference Standard was 0.64 (95 % CI: (0.49–0.78) p = 0.20. AUC of the best 4 features (MajorAxisLength, Median, SizeZoneNonUniformity, ZoneEntropy) were: 0.73 (95 % CI: 0.58–0.88); 0.71 (95 % CI: 0.54–0.88); 0.79 (95 % CI: 0.66–0.92); 0.68 (95 % CI: 0.53–0.83) respectively. Conclusion: A Radiomics approach improves radiological evaluation of focal and diffuse pattern of MM on CT.

Differentiating diffuse from focal pattern on Computed Tomography in multiple myeloma: Added value of a Radiomics approach

Tagliafico, Alberto;Cea, Michele;Rossi, Federica;Valdora, Francesca;Bignotti, Bianca;
2019-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: Focal pattern in multiple myeloma (MM) seems to be related to poorer survival and differentiation from diffuse to focal pattern on computed tomography (CT) has inter-reader variability. We postulated that a Radiomic approach could help radiologists in differentiating diffuse from focal patterns on CT. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed imaging data of 70 patients with MM with CT, PET-CT or MRI available before bone marrow transplant. Two general radiologist evaluated, in consensus, CT images to define a focal (at least one lytic lesion >5 mm in diameter) or a diffuse (lesions <5 mm, not osteoporosis) pattern. N = 104 Radiomics features were extracted and evaluated with an open source software. Results: The pathological group included: 22 diffuse and 39 focal patterns. After feature reduction, 9 features were different (p < 0.05) in the diffuse and focal patterns (n = 2/9 features were Shape-based: MajorAxisLength and Sphericity; n = 7/9 were Gray Level Run Length Matrix (Glrlm)). AUC of the Radiologists versus Reference Standard was 0.64 (95 % CI: (0.49–0.78) p = 0.20. AUC of the best 4 features (MajorAxisLength, Median, SizeZoneNonUniformity, ZoneEntropy) were: 0.73 (95 % CI: 0.58–0.88); 0.71 (95 % CI: 0.54–0.88); 0.79 (95 % CI: 0.66–0.92); 0.68 (95 % CI: 0.53–0.83) respectively. Conclusion: A Radiomics approach improves radiological evaluation of focal and diffuse pattern of MM on CT.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Taglia EJRR MM Radiomics 2019.pdf

accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 599.32 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
599.32 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/985103
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact