By starting with a case-law reconstruction, the work seeks to highlight applicative problems courts have experienced in determining the possibility for companies to lawfully rely on the linguistic exception to service under art. 8 of the Service of Documents Regulation. In an effort to at least partially settle the matter, it further elaborates some elements that – should they be transposed within a recital of the relevant instrument – could offer uniform guidelines to those judges before whom multinational companies invoke the refusal of service based on linguistic grounds.
SULLA TECNICA DELLA «FOCALIZZAZIONE» NEL CONTESTO DELLA NOTIFICA TRANSFRONTALIERA A PERSONE GIURIDICHE
stefano dominelli
2019-01-01
Abstract
By starting with a case-law reconstruction, the work seeks to highlight applicative problems courts have experienced in determining the possibility for companies to lawfully rely on the linguistic exception to service under art. 8 of the Service of Documents Regulation. In an effort to at least partially settle the matter, it further elaborates some elements that – should they be transposed within a recital of the relevant instrument – could offer uniform guidelines to those judges before whom multinational companies invoke the refusal of service based on linguistic grounds.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Notifiche priv e proc.pdf
accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione
96.06 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
96.06 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.