This essay presents a critical discussion on Brożek’s article “Imagination and Rule Following”. In the first part, it advances some concerns regarding the evidence which some Brożek’s assertions are based on. In the second part, it identifies three senses in which inadvertently the expression ‘normativity’ is used in his work. On this basis, the main idea of the essay is that some Brożek’s theses and, in particular, his central proposal about the existence of an unconscious, impoverished form of normativity and a conscious, full-blooded one are ambiguous because the sense in which he is using the expression is not clear.

Two Comments on Imagination and Rule Following

REDONDO NATELLA, MARIA CRISTINA
2019

Abstract

This essay presents a critical discussion on Brożek’s article “Imagination and Rule Following”. In the first part, it advances some concerns regarding the evidence which some Brożek’s assertions are based on. In the second part, it identifies three senses in which inadvertently the expression ‘normativity’ is used in his work. On this basis, the main idea of the essay is that some Brożek’s theses and, in particular, his central proposal about the existence of an unconscious, impoverished form of normativity and a conscious, full-blooded one are ambiguous because the sense in which he is using the expression is not clear.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Materiali. Comment on Brozek.pdf

accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 64.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
64.56 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11567/948383
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact