In this paper I focus on the connection between some of Stanley’s claims about propaganda and flawed ideologies, and the idea of the social situatedness or perspective-relativity of knowledge. More pre-cisely, I will try to show how Stanley’s reflections on the nature of pro-paganda and its relationship with flawed ideologies push us towards the empiricists’ characterisation of the social situatedness of knowledge. Not only do these reflections reveal some important weaknesses of standpoint theories (that is, the claim of epistemic asymmetry between advantaged and negatively advantaged groups, and the necessity of ac-tively achieving a standpoint), but they also support the request for the pluralism, rational critique, cooperation, fair discussion and epistemic integration fostered by social empiricism. This means that the broad idea of the social situatedness of knowledge should be defended and further developed along the lines sketched by social empiricism.
|Titolo:||Flawed Ideologies, Propaganda, and the Situatedness of Knowledge|
|Data di pubblicazione:||2018|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||01.01 - Articolo su rivista|
File in questo prodotto:
|0873626X-Disputatio-Flawed-Ideologies-Propaganda-and-the-Social-Situatedness-of-Knowledge.pdf||Articolo principale||Documento in versione editoriale||Open Access Visualizza/Apri|