Advances in the Exploration of Geothermal Resources of the East Africa Rift System (EARS)

This work focuses on the geological, geophysical and geochemical exploration of the geothermal reservoirs located in the East Africa Rift System (EARS), with particular reference to the characterisation of some geothermal fields located in Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania and Malawi. Moreover, this study provides an updated overview of the procedures for the exploration of geothermal resources and can serve therefore as a best-practice guide for future endeavours. Field activities included geological surveys, geophysical investigations (gravity, electromagnetic and seismic measurements) and geochemical survey/analyses. Moreover, stratigraphic data and P&T logs were available at some explored geothermal prospects. An overview of the main investigated geothermal fields was given and three case studies were described in detail as representative examples of geothermal play types of EARS: (i) the Alalobeda field (Ethiopia), located in correspondence of the triple junction Read Sea-Aden Gulf-Main Ethiopian Rift and (ii) the Kiejo-Mbaka field (Tanzania), belonging to EARS’ western branch, both falling in the extensional domain play type, fault controlled or fault-leakage controlled; (iii) the Menengai field (Kenya), the second most important geothermal field in EARS, where a huge quantity of direct data from more than twenty drilled wells is available. The latter can be classified as convection-dominated magmatic play type. Compared to geothermal fields of South-East Asia and Central America, the geothermal of EARS presents some peculiar characters and differences. The plutonic play-type (convection dominated), occurring in fore- or back-arc regions of fold-thrust belts along subduction zones, denotes a well-developed thick and continuous cap rock mainly formed by clay minerals. In the plutonic play of Menengai, the typical impermeable cap rock is practically missing. A “zonation” of the play types occurring in EARS can be recognized. The Western Branch is characterised by the presence of fault/fault-leakage controlled play types. In the Eastern Branch, geothermal plays are associated to active or quite recent volcanoes. Due to the foregoing characters, a different approach should be followed in order to characterize properly the geothermal fields present in EARS. In a subduction context, geophysical results from electromagnetic investigations play a fundamental role in the exploration of potential geothermal reservoirs, as in such an environment they are often succesfully used to detect the occurrence of an impermeable cap rock overlying the reservoir (target zone). Therefore, if the resistivity structures inferred in EARS geothermal plays are simply associated with “standard” resistivity models of cap rock-reservoir formations, the inferred geophysical conceptual model may be grossly incorrect. Wherefore, an accurate and integrated interpretation of all the geoscientific data is essential. In this regard, a detailed structural survey is of primary importance especially in the fault-controlled plays, whereas its importance is often under-estimated in subduction realms. A high-resolution structural survey allows to define a detailed configuration of fractures and faults that may control the fluid upflow from the reservoir. Concerning the application of geochemical methods, in EARS, typical approaches and models developed in the subduction geothermal systems should be re-evaluated. The high-temperature geothermal reservoirs of the Eastern branch (e.g., Olkaria and Menengai in Kenya, and Aluto-Langano in Ethiopia) host not only mature chloride waters, as the geothermal systems situated along subduction zones, but also mature bicarbonate-chloride and mature bicarbonate waters. In volcanic-magmatic regions, deep geothermal liquids are assumed to be produced through neutralization of initially acidic meteoric-magmatic aqueous solutions. The few available data for volcanic gases indicate that subduction zones volcanic gases are enriched in Cl relative to hot-spot and divergent-plate volcanic gases. Therefore, the comparatively small supply of Cl-bearing magmatic gas species (chiefly HCl) in the root of the Eastern EARS geothermal systems might be responsible for the comparatively low Cl contents of related geothermal liquids. The situation might be even more complicated in the western EARS, due to the absence of magmatic systems. Therefore, a more comprehensive approach to water classification is needed to distinguish mature waters from immature ones. In view of the differences with the geothermal systems hosted in subduction zone environments, the future exploration and development of geothermal resources of EARS should thus consider that geothermal resources are rarely due to the presence of a hot magmatic source, but rather to the crustal thinning, which determines thermal anomalies of moderate intensity. Moreover, favorable thermal conditions are not always accompanied by an adequate hydrogeological setting, expecially when they occur in low permeability basalts. In these cases, it is essential to pay attention to the structural setting, in order to design the wells with the highest likelihood of intersecting permeable tectonic structures. Unlike in most Indonesian fields, where permeability tends to be widespread throughout the rock, in the EARS permeability appears in many cases limited to major faults. The planned program of drilling in several prospects of Ethiopia and Tanzania will make available further information improving the overall understanding of the geothermal characteristics of EARS.