We examine the charitable giving decisions of donors under two subsidy mechanisms, rebate and matching, and we calculate the price elasticity of giving. We implement an online survey using the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform. Participants are asked to make a series of allocation decisions between themselves and a charity of their choice. We vary endowment and subsidy rates in line with the literature. The results show that contributions under matching subsidies are significantly higher than contributions under rebate subsidies. Participants who usually make a donation are more likely to give and are less responsive to price changes. Moreover, the probability of giving increases monotonically along with subsidy rates.

The price elasticity of charitable giving: New experimental evidence

Gandullia, Luca;Lezzi, Emanuela
2018-01-01

Abstract

We examine the charitable giving decisions of donors under two subsidy mechanisms, rebate and matching, and we calculate the price elasticity of giving. We implement an online survey using the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform. Participants are asked to make a series of allocation decisions between themselves and a charity of their choice. We vary endowment and subsidy rates in line with the literature. The results show that contributions under matching subsidies are significantly higher than contributions under rebate subsidies. Participants who usually make a donation are more likely to give and are less responsive to price changes. Moreover, the probability of giving increases monotonically along with subsidy rates.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
6. price elasticity.pdf

accesso chiuso

Descrizione: Paper price elasticity
Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 240.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
240.44 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/937686
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact