A small passage in Apul. Met. 11, 28 has always been considered as intact and incorrupted, but it actually hides at least one difficulty, namely in the strange use of an incidental "inquit". The problem seems to be of no great importance and so scholars generally keep trusting F’s text. But what if this inquit represented a corruption in the text? The new reading gains several advantages and it could perhaps help to solve another little problem in the syntax of the text.
Scheda prodotto non validato
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Titolo: | Nota ad Apuleio, Met. 11, 28. | |
Autori: | ||
Data di pubblicazione: | 2010 | |
Rivista: | ||
Abstract: | A small passage in Apul. Met. 11, 28 has always been considered as intact and incorrupted, but it actually hides at least one difficulty, namely in the strange use of an incidental "inquit". The problem seems to be of no great importance and so scholars generally keep trusting F’s text. But what if this inquit represented a corruption in the text? The new reading gains several advantages and it could perhaps help to solve another little problem in the syntax of the text. | |
Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11567/885801 | |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 01.01 - Articolo su rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.