In Machine Learning (ML), the learning process of an algorithm given a set of evidences is studied via complexity measures. The way towards using ML complexity measures in the Human Learning (HL) domain has been paved by a previous study, which introduced Human Rademacher Complexity (HRC): in this work, we introduce Human Algorithmic Stability (HAS). Exploratory experiments, performed on a group of students, show the superiority of HAS against HRC, since HAS allows grasping the nature and complexity of the task to learn.

Human algorithmic stability and Human Rademacher Complexity

VAHDAT, MEHRNOOSH;ONETO, LUCA;GHIO, ALESSANDRO;ANGUITA, DAVIDE;
2015-01-01

Abstract

In Machine Learning (ML), the learning process of an algorithm given a set of evidences is studied via complexity measures. The way towards using ML complexity measures in the Human Learning (HL) domain has been paved by a previous study, which introduced Human Rademacher Complexity (HRC): in this work, we introduce Human Algorithmic Stability (HAS). Exploratory experiments, performed on a group of students, show the superiority of HAS against HRC, since HAS allows grasping the nature and complexity of the task to learn.
2015
9782875870148
9782875870148
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
C027.pdf

accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Dimensione 251.52 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
251.52 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/845888
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact