Background: Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is recommended in patients with cirrhosis. As a-fetoprotein (AFP) is considered a poor surveillance test, we tested the performance of its changes over time. Methods: Eighty patients were diagnosed with HCC (cases) during semiannual surveillance with ultrasonography and AFP measurement were recruited and matched for age, gender, etiology and Child-Pugh class with 160 contemporary cancer-free controls undergoing the same surveillance training group (TG). As a validation group (VG) we considered 36 subsequent patients diagnosed with HCC, matched 1 : 3 with contemporary cancer-free controls. a-Fetoprotein values at the time of HCC diagnosis (T0) and its changes over the 12 (D12) and 6 months (D6) before cancer detection were considered. Results: In both TG and VG, 480% of HCCs were found at an early stage. In TG, AFP significantly increased over time only in cases. T0 AFP and a positive D6 were independently associated with HCC diagnosis (odds ratio: 1.031 and 2.402, respectively). The area under the curve of T0 AFP was 0.76 and its best cutoff (BC) was 10 ng ml1 (sensitivity 66.3%, specificity 80.6%). The combination of AFP 410 ng ml1 or a positive D6 composite a-fetoprotein index (CAI) increased the sensitivity to 80% with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 86.2%. Negative predictive value rose to 99%, considering a cancer prevalence of 3%. In the VG, the AFP-BC was again 10 ng ml1 (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 88.9%), and CAI sensitivity was 80.6% with a NPV value of 90.5%. Conclusions: CAI achieves adequate sensitivity and NPV as a surveillance test for the early detection of HCC in cirrhosis.

A new approach to the use of alfa-fetoprotein as surveillance test for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis.

GIANNINI, EDOARDO GIOVANNI;
2015-01-01

Abstract

Background: Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is recommended in patients with cirrhosis. As a-fetoprotein (AFP) is considered a poor surveillance test, we tested the performance of its changes over time. Methods: Eighty patients were diagnosed with HCC (cases) during semiannual surveillance with ultrasonography and AFP measurement were recruited and matched for age, gender, etiology and Child-Pugh class with 160 contemporary cancer-free controls undergoing the same surveillance training group (TG). As a validation group (VG) we considered 36 subsequent patients diagnosed with HCC, matched 1 : 3 with contemporary cancer-free controls. a-Fetoprotein values at the time of HCC diagnosis (T0) and its changes over the 12 (D12) and 6 months (D6) before cancer detection were considered. Results: In both TG and VG, 480% of HCCs were found at an early stage. In TG, AFP significantly increased over time only in cases. T0 AFP and a positive D6 were independently associated with HCC diagnosis (odds ratio: 1.031 and 2.402, respectively). The area under the curve of T0 AFP was 0.76 and its best cutoff (BC) was 10 ng ml1 (sensitivity 66.3%, specificity 80.6%). The combination of AFP 410 ng ml1 or a positive D6 composite a-fetoprotein index (CAI) increased the sensitivity to 80% with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 86.2%. Negative predictive value rose to 99%, considering a cancer prevalence of 3%. In the VG, the AFP-BC was again 10 ng ml1 (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 88.9%), and CAI sensitivity was 80.6% with a NPV value of 90.5%. Conclusions: CAI achieves adequate sensitivity and NPV as a surveillance test for the early detection of HCC in cirrhosis.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Br J Cancer & AFP.pdf

accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 886.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
886.18 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/735779
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 26
  • Scopus 66
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 59
social impact