PURPOSE: This retrospective cohort study investigated the clinical effectiveness of preformed oval-shaped glass fiber posts in combination with a dual-curing composite resin core material in endodontically treated premolars presenting an oval root canal cross-section and restored with all-ceramic crowns over up to 45 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 134 patients and 154 endodontically treated premolars, with varying degrees of hard tissue loss, restored by means of oval-shaped fiber-reinforced posts. Inclusion criteria were premolars presenting an oval-shaped root canal, symptom-free endodontic therapy, root canal treatment with a minimum apical seal of 4 mm, application of rubber dam, and the need for a post and core complex because of coronal tooth loss. Four groups were defined based on the number of preserved coronal walls after endodontic treatment and before core buildup. Survival rate of the post and core restorations was determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and statistical analysis was performed using the log-rank test (P < .05). RESULTS: The posts and cores were examined clinically and radiographically. The mean observation period was 42.3 ± 2.7 months. The overall survival rate was 95.45%. Comparisons revealed that the difference between premolars with no coronal wall retention and premolars that had maintained one to four coronal walls was statistically significant (P = .0006). On the contrary, comparison between premolars with one and two residual walls was found to be not significant for the overall survival rate (P = .0698). CONCLUSION: A satisfactory clinical performance was observed for preformed oval-shaped glass fiber posts. Survival was higher for teeth retaining three and four coronal walls.

Clinical evaluation of an oval-shaped prefabricated glass fiber post in endodontically treated premolare presenting an oval root canal cross-section: a retrospective cohort study

RAVERA, GIAMBATTISTA;ANGIERO, FRANCESCA;BENEDICENTI, STEFANO
2011-01-01

Abstract

PURPOSE: This retrospective cohort study investigated the clinical effectiveness of preformed oval-shaped glass fiber posts in combination with a dual-curing composite resin core material in endodontically treated premolars presenting an oval root canal cross-section and restored with all-ceramic crowns over up to 45 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 134 patients and 154 endodontically treated premolars, with varying degrees of hard tissue loss, restored by means of oval-shaped fiber-reinforced posts. Inclusion criteria were premolars presenting an oval-shaped root canal, symptom-free endodontic therapy, root canal treatment with a minimum apical seal of 4 mm, application of rubber dam, and the need for a post and core complex because of coronal tooth loss. Four groups were defined based on the number of preserved coronal walls after endodontic treatment and before core buildup. Survival rate of the post and core restorations was determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and statistical analysis was performed using the log-rank test (P < .05). RESULTS: The posts and cores were examined clinically and radiographically. The mean observation period was 42.3 ± 2.7 months. The overall survival rate was 95.45%. Comparisons revealed that the difference between premolars with no coronal wall retention and premolars that had maintained one to four coronal walls was statistically significant (P = .0006). On the contrary, comparison between premolars with one and two residual walls was found to be not significant for the overall survival rate (P = .0698). CONCLUSION: A satisfactory clinical performance was observed for preformed oval-shaped glass fiber posts. Survival was higher for teeth retaining three and four coronal walls.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/254746
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact