Based on the error figures obtained after laboratory tests over a wide set of operational rain gauges from the network of the Liguria region, the bias introduced by systematic mechanical errors of tipping bucket rain gauges in the estimation of return periods and other statistics of rainfall extremes is quantified. An equivalent sample size is defined as a simple index that can be easily employed by practitioner engineers to measure the influence of systematic mechanical errors on common hydrological practice and the derived hydraulic engineering design. A few consequences of the presented results are discussed, with reference to data set reconstruction issues and the risk of introducing artificial climate trends in the observed rain records.

Tipping bucket mechanical errors and their influence on rainfall statistics and extremes

LA BARBERA, PAOLO;LANZA, LUCA GIOVANNI;STAGI, LUIGI
2002-01-01

Abstract

Based on the error figures obtained after laboratory tests over a wide set of operational rain gauges from the network of the Liguria region, the bias introduced by systematic mechanical errors of tipping bucket rain gauges in the estimation of return periods and other statistics of rainfall extremes is quantified. An equivalent sample size is defined as a simple index that can be easily employed by practitioner engineers to measure the influence of systematic mechanical errors on common hydrological practice and the derived hydraulic engineering design. A few consequences of the presented results are discussed, with reference to data set reconstruction issues and the risk of introducing artificial climate trends in the observed rain records.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/248543
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 69
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 56
social impact