Aim of this study was to investigate the biological activity of eight bone graft materials analyzing their influence on osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. The materials were classified as: Synthetic materials: Sintbone (Ghimas), Fisiograft (Ghimas) and Ostim (Heraeus-Kulzer). Animal-derived materials: Biogen (Biotek), BioOss (Geistlich) and Osteograft (Dentsply-Friadent). Mixed materials: Biostite (Vebas) and PepGen P-15 (Dentsply- Friadent). The bone graft materials have been tested by the MTT test (proliferation quantitative analysis) using osteoblasts SaOS- 2 coming from human osteosarchoma. Afterwards the ALP enzymatic assay was performed. Both tests were repeated three times for each specimen at 3 and 5 days. After the quantitative evaluation of the cellular proliferation by MTT test, we quantified the absorbance value for each specimen using a spectrophotometer at 405nm and we calculated the mean ALP value for each specimen, for each group of materials and the ALP/ MTT ratio. Data were statistically analyzed (ANOVA one way and post hoc Scheffe` tests). The mean values of MTT (proliferation test) and of ALP (differentiation test) were different between tested materials. Within the limits of the in vitro studies it can be concluded that: Tested bone graft materials induced different amounts of cell proliferation and differentiation. Synthetic and animal-derived materials showed the best values of both parameters considered (proliferation and differentiation) statistically different from mixed materials (P < 0.05). In particular, Biostite (mixed materials) showed statistically lowest values of proliferation and differentiation (this material has a cytotoxic effect) with respect to the others (P < 0.001). Synthetic materials, as well as animal-derived ones could be used.

Osteoblast proliferation and differentiation on different bone graft materials

PERA, PAOLO
2006-01-01

Abstract

Aim of this study was to investigate the biological activity of eight bone graft materials analyzing their influence on osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. The materials were classified as: Synthetic materials: Sintbone (Ghimas), Fisiograft (Ghimas) and Ostim (Heraeus-Kulzer). Animal-derived materials: Biogen (Biotek), BioOss (Geistlich) and Osteograft (Dentsply-Friadent). Mixed materials: Biostite (Vebas) and PepGen P-15 (Dentsply- Friadent). The bone graft materials have been tested by the MTT test (proliferation quantitative analysis) using osteoblasts SaOS- 2 coming from human osteosarchoma. Afterwards the ALP enzymatic assay was performed. Both tests were repeated three times for each specimen at 3 and 5 days. After the quantitative evaluation of the cellular proliferation by MTT test, we quantified the absorbance value for each specimen using a spectrophotometer at 405nm and we calculated the mean ALP value for each specimen, for each group of materials and the ALP/ MTT ratio. Data were statistically analyzed (ANOVA one way and post hoc Scheffe` tests). The mean values of MTT (proliferation test) and of ALP (differentiation test) were different between tested materials. Within the limits of the in vitro studies it can be concluded that: Tested bone graft materials induced different amounts of cell proliferation and differentiation. Synthetic and animal-derived materials showed the best values of both parameters considered (proliferation and differentiation) statistically different from mixed materials (P < 0.05). In particular, Biostite (mixed materials) showed statistically lowest values of proliferation and differentiation (this material has a cytotoxic effect) with respect to the others (P < 0.001). Synthetic materials, as well as animal-derived ones could be used.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/215771
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact