Purpose: To assess the role of artificial intelligence (AI) based automated software for detection of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) compared with the evaluation of digital retinography by two double masked retina specialists. Methods: Two-hundred one patients (mean age 65 ± 13 years) with type 1 diabetes mellitus or type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. All patients were undergoing a retinography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT, DRI 3D OCT-2000, Topcon) of the macula. The retinal photographs were graded using two validated AI DR screening software (Eye Art TM and IDx-DR) designed to identify more than mild DR. Results: Retinal images of 201 patients were graded. DR (more than mild DR) was detected by the ophthalmologists in 38 (18.9%) patients and by the AI-algorithms in 36 patients (with 30 eyes diagnosed by both algorithms). Ungradable patients by the AI software were 13 (6.5%) and 16 (8%) for the Eye Art and IDx-DR, respectively. Both AI software strategies showed a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting any more than mild DR without showing any statistically significant difference between them. Conclusions: The comparison between the diagnosis provided by artificial intelligence based automated software and the reference clinical diagnosis showed that they can work at a level of sensitivity that is similar to that achieved by experts.
Autonomous artificial intelligence versus teleophthalmology for diabetic retinopathy
Musetti D.;Cutolo C. A.;Bonetto M.;Giacomini M.;Maggi D.;Viviani G. L.;Traverso C. E.;Nicolo M.
2024-01-01
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the role of artificial intelligence (AI) based automated software for detection of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) compared with the evaluation of digital retinography by two double masked retina specialists. Methods: Two-hundred one patients (mean age 65 ± 13 years) with type 1 diabetes mellitus or type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. All patients were undergoing a retinography and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT, DRI 3D OCT-2000, Topcon) of the macula. The retinal photographs were graded using two validated AI DR screening software (Eye Art TM and IDx-DR) designed to identify more than mild DR. Results: Retinal images of 201 patients were graded. DR (more than mild DR) was detected by the ophthalmologists in 38 (18.9%) patients and by the AI-algorithms in 36 patients (with 30 eyes diagnosed by both algorithms). Ungradable patients by the AI software were 13 (6.5%) and 16 (8%) for the Eye Art and IDx-DR, respectively. Both AI software strategies showed a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting any more than mild DR without showing any statistically significant difference between them. Conclusions: The comparison between the diagnosis provided by artificial intelligence based automated software and the reference clinical diagnosis showed that they can work at a level of sensitivity that is similar to that achieved by experts.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
