Background: In last years the diffusion of carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) is increasing worldwide, mainly due to the expression of carbapenemases. Cefiderocol has molecular characteristics that ideally confers activity against all CR-GNB, but resistant strains have already been identified. We describe cefiderocol susceptibility profile among multi-drug resistant Gram-negative isolated from pediatric patients. Methods: Prospective, single pediatric center study, 1st January 2020–15th June 2023. All GNB carbapenemases producers or phenotypically carbapenem-resistant isolated in the study period were tested for cefiderocol susceptibility. Clinical and microbiological data were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed, comparing the groups of cefiderocol-resistant vs. cefiderocol-susceptible Enterobacterales and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB). Results: Forty-seven GNB were tested for cefiderocol susceptibility; 38% were cefiderocol-resistant: 16/30 (52%) among Enterobacterales and 2/17 (12%) among NF-GNB. None of the patients were previously exposed to cefiderocol. Looking at Enterobacterales, resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was higher among cefiderocol-resistant vs. cefiderocol-susceptible strains (62% vs 36%, respectively), as MBL expression (67% vs. 36%, respectively). Too few NF-GNB were cefiderocol-resistance to draw any conclusion. No difference in ICU admission and mortality was identified comparing cefiderocol-resistant vs. susceptible strains. Patients colonized/infected by cefiderocol-resistant strains had been previously hospitalized more frequently. Conclusion: In our cohort cefiderocol resistance was mostly registered among Enterobacterales, and especially among MBL producers’ strains (that were alongside resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam). This could be explained by the known possible cross resistance mechanism among ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol. Also, correlation of cefiderocol-resistance with previous hospitalization could be associated with horizontal resistance transmission. Looking at our data, we believe that cefiderocol should be use cautiously, especially empirically and in monotherapy, due to the high resistance rate.
Reduce susceptibility to cefiderocol in gram negative bacteria in children: Is hope already lost before it's even arrived?
Russo C.;Mesini A.;Mariani M.;Tavella E.;Sette C.;Bartalucci C.;Palmero C.;Bandettini R.;Castagnola E.
2024-01-01
Abstract
Background: In last years the diffusion of carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) is increasing worldwide, mainly due to the expression of carbapenemases. Cefiderocol has molecular characteristics that ideally confers activity against all CR-GNB, but resistant strains have already been identified. We describe cefiderocol susceptibility profile among multi-drug resistant Gram-negative isolated from pediatric patients. Methods: Prospective, single pediatric center study, 1st January 2020–15th June 2023. All GNB carbapenemases producers or phenotypically carbapenem-resistant isolated in the study period were tested for cefiderocol susceptibility. Clinical and microbiological data were collected. A descriptive analysis was performed, comparing the groups of cefiderocol-resistant vs. cefiderocol-susceptible Enterobacterales and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB). Results: Forty-seven GNB were tested for cefiderocol susceptibility; 38% were cefiderocol-resistant: 16/30 (52%) among Enterobacterales and 2/17 (12%) among NF-GNB. None of the patients were previously exposed to cefiderocol. Looking at Enterobacterales, resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was higher among cefiderocol-resistant vs. cefiderocol-susceptible strains (62% vs 36%, respectively), as MBL expression (67% vs. 36%, respectively). Too few NF-GNB were cefiderocol-resistance to draw any conclusion. No difference in ICU admission and mortality was identified comparing cefiderocol-resistant vs. susceptible strains. Patients colonized/infected by cefiderocol-resistant strains had been previously hospitalized more frequently. Conclusion: In our cohort cefiderocol resistance was mostly registered among Enterobacterales, and especially among MBL producers’ strains (that were alongside resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam). This could be explained by the known possible cross resistance mechanism among ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol. Also, correlation of cefiderocol-resistance with previous hospitalization could be associated with horizontal resistance transmission. Looking at our data, we believe that cefiderocol should be use cautiously, especially empirically and in monotherapy, due to the high resistance rate.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
