The work examines the argumentative path followed by the Constitutional Court in accepting a question of constitutional legitimacy concerning a provision already scruti- nized ten years ago — in relation to other provisions contained therein — with sentence n. 22 of 2012 and always with reference to art. 77, co. 2 of the Constitution. In particular, this article analyzes the reasoning of the ruling and its connections with the most recent jurisprudence of the Court on the subject of homogeneity of amendments to decree-laws; the still non-univocal character of the latter is underlined, suggesting the hypothesis that the elasticity of the concept of homogeneity is better suited to the more recent forms of control exercised by the President of the Republic on the emergency decree (both during the issuing of the decree-law, and during the promulgation of the conversion law).

DIECI ANNI DOPO LA SENTENZA DI INCOSTITUZIONALITÀ N. 22 DEL 2012: MODESTE EREDITÀ E INEDITE APPLICAZIONI DELLA GIURISPRUDENZA COSTITUZIONALE IN TEMA DI DECRETAZIONE D'URGENZA (Nota a sentenza Corte costituzionale 9 dicembre 2022, n. 245)

Michele Francaviglia
2022-01-01

Abstract

The work examines the argumentative path followed by the Constitutional Court in accepting a question of constitutional legitimacy concerning a provision already scruti- nized ten years ago — in relation to other provisions contained therein — with sentence n. 22 of 2012 and always with reference to art. 77, co. 2 of the Constitution. In particular, this article analyzes the reasoning of the ruling and its connections with the most recent jurisprudence of the Court on the subject of homogeneity of amendments to decree-laws; the still non-univocal character of the latter is underlined, suggesting the hypothesis that the elasticity of the concept of homogeneity is better suited to the more recent forms of control exercised by the President of the Republic on the emergency decree (both during the issuing of the decree-law, and during the promulgation of the conversion law).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Francaviglia Dieci anni dopo Corte cost. 22_2022.pdf

accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 294.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
294.47 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/1130755
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact