Sobre el positivismo juridico interno. Algunas respuestas

This paper contains a response to six comments on my book Positivismo jurídico ‘interno’. These comments were originally delivered in an online seminar organized as part of the activities of the research group at Pompeu Fabra University in Barcelona and later published in Doxa, 45: pp. 495-627. The first response refers to the work of Alberto Carrió andfocuses on some ontological and epistemological distinctions on which my work is based. The second refers to the commentary of Alba Lojo, which aims mainly to discuss the form of reasoning imposed by legal norms. The third refers to Sebastián Agüero’s writing on the positivist theory of Eugenio Bulygin. The fourth refers to Osvaldo de la Fuente’s essay on the interpretative methodological proposal in general and of Fernando Atria in particular. The fifth refers to the critique formulated by Lorena Ramírez on the distinction between two meanings of the expressions «internal point of view» and «external point of view». The last one refers to the final commentary of José Juan Moreso, which essentially considers two ideas: the thesis that the law is an ideal, normative object that cannot be reduced to empirical data, and the thesis that its practical character can be explained by the form of reasoning that the law imposes when it proposes universal norms.