The article analyses the new text of Article 41 of the Italian constitution, pointing out its innovative aspects and analysing its shortcomings. Above all, the article argues that the major innovations of the new text are in fact very little innovative, as they can already be deduced through interpretation from the previous text, also in light of the new Article 9. On the other hand, the legislator's choice appears to be not very courageous and, consequently, defective in not having strengthened the position of environmental stakeholders in public decision-making processes.
Proficuo, inutile o dannoso? Alcune riflessioni a partire dal nuovo testo dell’art. 41
E. Mostacci
2022-01-01
Abstract
The article analyses the new text of Article 41 of the Italian constitution, pointing out its innovative aspects and analysing its shortcomings. Above all, the article argues that the major innovations of the new text are in fact very little innovative, as they can already be deduced through interpretation from the previous text, also in light of the new Article 9. On the other hand, the legislator's choice appears to be not very courageous and, consequently, defective in not having strengthened the position of environmental stakeholders in public decision-making processes.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
document.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: MOSTACCI, Edmondo. Proficuo, inutile o dannoso? Alcune riflessioni a partire dal nuovo testo dell’art. 41. DPCE Online, [S.l.], v. 52, n. 2, july 2022. ISSN 2037-6677. Available at: .
Tipologia:
Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione
557.46 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
557.46 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.