Dermatoscopically narrowed surgical margins for head and neck basal cell carcinoma: A retrospective case-control study

Background: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) can cause extensive tissue damage if untreated. Complete surgical excision is the treatment of choice, but especially in the head-and neck area, defining both radical and healthy skin sparing surgical margins is complex.Materials and methods: Excised, small (>= 1 cm), BCCs of the head and neck were retrospectively analyzed, comparing histological properness of surgical margins after clinical-dermatoscopical preoperative evaluation (cases), vs. clinical evaluation only (controls) and recurrences.Results: Of 281 BCCs: 6 % (8/139) of cases and 8 % (12/142) of controls had unproper deep margins; 4 % (5/139) of cases, 20 % (29/142) of controls had unproper lateral margins (P < 0.001). Surgical 3 mm lateral margins were unproper in 0 % (15/66) of cases, 15 % (10/66) of controls (P > 0.005); surgical 1-2 mm lateral margins were unproper in 7 % (5/73) of cases, 25 % (19/76) of controls (P < 0.01). Of cases excised at 3 mm, 1-2 mm, and controls, 1.5 %, 0 %, and 7.7 % recurred, respectively.Conclusions: BCC excision at 3 mm may be appropriate in the head and neck for small, dermatoscopically well-defined and non-aggressive BCCs, attaining surgical cure rates of 100 % and 1.5 % recurrences. Excision at 1-2 mm should be reserved only for BCCs in very difficult-to-treat areas, as the surgical cure rate was only 93 %.