Article 13 of the Resolution is devoted to a specific profile of the relationship between human rights and private international law. Included within the provisions devoted to personal statuses and family relations, it addresses the theme of marriage, affirming the basic principle that the bond must be founded on the spouses’ free and full consent, removed from any form of external conditioning. This also has an impact on the recognition of spousal status: as a matter of principle, the respect for fundamental human rights requires that a refusal of recognition must be opposed whenever it emerges that the will of a member of the couple has been flawed, as happens in particular in cases of early and/or forced marriages. However, the rigidity of such an approach is tempered by an openness to case-by-case assessment: para. 3 provides that the valorisation of the possible interest of the 'victim' in maintaining the status is exceptionally allowed. This approach seems to be acceptable, as it moves from a proper balancing of the fundamental rights at stake.

Art. 13 della risoluzione dell’Institut de Droit International su Human Rights and Private International Law: il matrimonio fondato sul consenso (pieno e libero) dei nubendi

F. Pesce
2022-01-01

Abstract

Article 13 of the Resolution is devoted to a specific profile of the relationship between human rights and private international law. Included within the provisions devoted to personal statuses and family relations, it addresses the theme of marriage, affirming the basic principle that the bond must be founded on the spouses’ free and full consent, removed from any form of external conditioning. This also has an impact on the recognition of spousal status: as a matter of principle, the respect for fundamental human rights requires that a refusal of recognition must be opposed whenever it emerges that the will of a member of the couple has been flawed, as happens in particular in cases of early and/or forced marriages. However, the rigidity of such an approach is tempered by an openness to case-by-case assessment: para. 3 provides that the valorisation of the possible interest of the 'victim' in maintaining the status is exceptionally allowed. This approach seems to be acceptable, as it moves from a proper balancing of the fundamental rights at stake.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1971-7105-38024-8.pdf

accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 291.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
291.97 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/1106082
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact