Following a baseline night recording, 9 narcoleptic subjects and 9 sex- and age-matched control subjects were maintained on 16 h of diurnal sleep deprivation. Thereafter subjects were submitted to a 32 h bed rest protocol in a sound- and light-attenuated room. The EEG was recorded and processed by a Fast Fourier Transform. Narcoleptics did not differ from controls in total sleep time over the whole 32 h, but spent more time sleeping during the daytime (DT). In both groups slow wave activity (SWA) showed an exponential decaying trend during the first night (N1); a similar exponential trend during the second night (N2) was evident only in controls. In controls SWA showed a circadian-circasemidian distribution that was hardly detectable in narcoleptics. Narcoleptics showed an ultradian distribution of SWA with periodic emergence every 4 h during DT and N2. Our data confirm that a homeostatic mechanism is evident in narcoleptics when stimulated by diurnal sleep deprivation, while circadian and circasemidian mechanisms are less evident during DT and N2. These findings suggest a different coupling between homeostatic sleep regulating processes and circadian drives to sleep in narcoleptics. Ultradian drives to sleep seem to be predominant in these patients, thus probably acting as a means for the avoidance of stressful attempts to counteract a weaker waking state maintenance mechanism. © 1995.
Dynamics of slow wave activity in narcoleptic patients under bed rest conditions
Nobili L.;Ferrillo F.;Rosadini G.;
1995-01-01
Abstract
Following a baseline night recording, 9 narcoleptic subjects and 9 sex- and age-matched control subjects were maintained on 16 h of diurnal sleep deprivation. Thereafter subjects were submitted to a 32 h bed rest protocol in a sound- and light-attenuated room. The EEG was recorded and processed by a Fast Fourier Transform. Narcoleptics did not differ from controls in total sleep time over the whole 32 h, but spent more time sleeping during the daytime (DT). In both groups slow wave activity (SWA) showed an exponential decaying trend during the first night (N1); a similar exponential trend during the second night (N2) was evident only in controls. In controls SWA showed a circadian-circasemidian distribution that was hardly detectable in narcoleptics. Narcoleptics showed an ultradian distribution of SWA with periodic emergence every 4 h during DT and N2. Our data confirm that a homeostatic mechanism is evident in narcoleptics when stimulated by diurnal sleep deprivation, while circadian and circasemidian mechanisms are less evident during DT and N2. These findings suggest a different coupling between homeostatic sleep regulating processes and circadian drives to sleep in narcoleptics. Ultradian drives to sleep seem to be predominant in these patients, thus probably acting as a means for the avoidance of stressful attempts to counteract a weaker waking state maintenance mechanism. © 1995.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.