The essay intends to jointly examine the institutional and jurisprudential trajectories drawn by the President and the Constitutional Court in the matter of urgent decree, with particular reference to the concept of homogeneity. The paper analyzes and compares some recent statements by the Head of State and the Court's ruling no. 8 of 2022 in order to reconstruct the limits and potentialities deriving from the overall concurrence of these two 'parallel jurisprudences'.
Sulle traiettorie divergenti della Corte costituzionale e del Presidente della Repubblica sulla decretazione d’urgenza. Un tentativo di analisi sinottica a margine di Corte cost., sent. n. 8 del 2022
M. Francaviglia
2022-01-01
Abstract
The essay intends to jointly examine the institutional and jurisprudential trajectories drawn by the President and the Constitutional Court in the matter of urgent decree, with particular reference to the concept of homogeneity. The paper analyzes and compares some recent statements by the Head of State and the Court's ruling no. 8 of 2022 in order to reconstruct the limits and potentialities deriving from the overall concurrence of these two 'parallel jurisprudences'.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Francaviglia Sulle traiettorie divergenti.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione
479.83 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
479.83 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.