Purpose: To perform an external validation of a recently published nomogram aimed to predict positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) by Rauscher et al. (Eur Urol 73(5):656–661, 2018). Methods: Overall, 413 PCa patients with BCR after RP (two consecutive PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml) and PSA value between 0.2 and 1 ng/ml were included. A multivariable logistic regression model was produced to assess the predictors of positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. The performance characteristics of the model were assessed by quantifying the predictive accuracy, according to model calibration. Yuden’s index was used to find the best nomogram’s cut-off. Finally, decision curve analysis (DCA) was implemented to quantify the nomogram’s clinical value. Results: In the external cohort, the overall detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was 44% vs. 64.7% in the original population. At multivariate analysis, PSA at 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (OR: 7.06, p < 0.001) and ongoing ADT at time of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (OR: 2.07, p = 0.03) were the only independent predictors of PET/CT positivity. The predictive accuracy of nomogram was suboptimal and comparable to that reported in the original model (64% vs. 67%, respectively). The calibration plot indicated suboptimal concordance. The best nomogram’s cut-off to predict positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was 35% (AUC = 0.61). In DCA, the nomogram revealed clinical net benefit when the threshold probabilities of positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is > 35%. Conclusion: We assessed similar suboptimal predictive accuracies in the external cohort compared to the original one. PSA and ongoing ADT were confirmed as positive predictors, and the most informative nomogram cut-off resulted 35%.

Predictive accuracy and clinical benefit of a nomogram aimed to predict 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT positivity in patients with prostate cancer recurrence and PSA < 1 ng/ml external validation on a single institution database

Borghesi M.;Ceci F.
2020-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: To perform an external validation of a recently published nomogram aimed to predict positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) by Rauscher et al. (Eur Urol 73(5):656–661, 2018). Methods: Overall, 413 PCa patients with BCR after RP (two consecutive PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml) and PSA value between 0.2 and 1 ng/ml were included. A multivariable logistic regression model was produced to assess the predictors of positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT results. The performance characteristics of the model were assessed by quantifying the predictive accuracy, according to model calibration. Yuden’s index was used to find the best nomogram’s cut-off. Finally, decision curve analysis (DCA) was implemented to quantify the nomogram’s clinical value. Results: In the external cohort, the overall detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was 44% vs. 64.7% in the original population. At multivariate analysis, PSA at 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (OR: 7.06, p < 0.001) and ongoing ADT at time of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (OR: 2.07, p = 0.03) were the only independent predictors of PET/CT positivity. The predictive accuracy of nomogram was suboptimal and comparable to that reported in the original model (64% vs. 67%, respectively). The calibration plot indicated suboptimal concordance. The best nomogram’s cut-off to predict positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was 35% (AUC = 0.61). In DCA, the nomogram revealed clinical net benefit when the threshold probabilities of positive 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is > 35%. Conclusion: We assessed similar suboptimal predictive accuracies in the external cohort compared to the original one. PSA and ongoing ADT were confirmed as positive predictors, and the most informative nomogram cut-off resulted 35%.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/1070369
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact