The present investigation addresses the issue of thermal insulation of building walls. In particular, the case of a wall subjected to Mediterranean climatic conditions, typical for the city of Genoa (Italy), is taken into account. A comparison between a polyurethane and a PCM layer with a thickness of 4 cm is proposed. The analysis is developed numerically by implementing a finite elements model of the wall in Comsol Multiphysics. The wall is subjected to real climatic conditions extracted from historical meteorological data and the thermal demand for heating and cooling is estimated. Both the polyurethane and the PCM have positive performances. In particular, polyurethane is more effective in reducing the heating demand, whereas PCM has better performances in reducing the cooling demand. A brief introduction to the life cycle analysis is also provided with the estimation of the energy pay-back for the two insulators and the results highlight better performance for the PCM, even though the pay-back periods of the two are quite similar.

Application of PCMs to Improve Energy Efficiency in Residential Buildings

Bianco V.;Marchitto A.;Scarpa F.;Tagliafico L. A.
2021

Abstract

The present investigation addresses the issue of thermal insulation of building walls. In particular, the case of a wall subjected to Mediterranean climatic conditions, typical for the city of Genoa (Italy), is taken into account. A comparison between a polyurethane and a PCM layer with a thickness of 4 cm is proposed. The analysis is developed numerically by implementing a finite elements model of the wall in Comsol Multiphysics. The wall is subjected to real climatic conditions extracted from historical meteorological data and the thermal demand for heating and cooling is estimated. Both the polyurethane and the PCM have positive performances. In particular, polyurethane is more effective in reducing the heating demand, whereas PCM has better performances in reducing the cooling demand. A brief introduction to the life cycle analysis is also provided with the estimation of the energy pay-back for the two insulators and the results highlight better performance for the PCM, even though the pay-back periods of the two are quite similar.
978-3-030-72403-0
978-3-030-72404-7
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11567/1069940
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact