The decision n. 73/2020 of the Italian Constitutional Court sets out an unprecedented line of reasoning which enhances the subjective ground of culpability, through the principle of proportionality and reasonableness. Starting from the recent constitutional judgment about the circumstance of partial mental insanity (art. 89 c.p.), up to the previous sentences on recidivism and article 69, co. 4, c.p., it is possible to fully understand the sense of this new reasoning based on culpability, particularly in its consequences for the commensuration of criminal sanction

Offensività e colpevolezza nel controllo di costituzionalità in materia di recidiva e giudizio di bilanciamento

Emmanuele Penco
2021-01-01

Abstract

The decision n. 73/2020 of the Italian Constitutional Court sets out an unprecedented line of reasoning which enhances the subjective ground of culpability, through the principle of proportionality and reasonableness. Starting from the recent constitutional judgment about the circumstance of partial mental insanity (art. 89 c.p.), up to the previous sentences on recidivism and article 69, co. 4, c.p., it is possible to fully understand the sense of this new reasoning based on culpability, particularly in its consequences for the commensuration of criminal sanction
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Penco_DPP_2.2021.pdf

accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 137.36 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
137.36 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/1038547
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact