The decision n. 73/2020 of the Italian Constitutional Court sets out an unprecedented line of reasoning which enhances the subjective ground of culpability, through the principle of proportionality and reasonableness. Starting from the recent constitutional judgment about the circumstance of partial mental insanity (art. 89 c.p.), up to the previous sentences on recidivism and article 69, co. 4, c.p., it is possible to fully understand the sense of this new reasoning based on culpability, particularly in its consequences for the commensuration of criminal sanction
Offensività e colpevolezza nel controllo di costituzionalità in materia di recidiva e giudizio di bilanciamento
Emmanuele Penco
2021-01-01
Abstract
The decision n. 73/2020 of the Italian Constitutional Court sets out an unprecedented line of reasoning which enhances the subjective ground of culpability, through the principle of proportionality and reasonableness. Starting from the recent constitutional judgment about the circumstance of partial mental insanity (art. 89 c.p.), up to the previous sentences on recidivism and article 69, co. 4, c.p., it is possible to fully understand the sense of this new reasoning based on culpability, particularly in its consequences for the commensuration of criminal sanctionFile in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Penco_DPP_2.2021.pdf
accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione
137.36 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
137.36 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.