In this paper, after a short introduction on the use of the indexical “we”, I discuss Andronico’s stance on transcendental and empirical interpretations of “we” in the late Wittgenstein. Besides a fundamental agreement, I raise some doubts on her stance of considering “we” as the viewpoint of philosophical analysis. Although her interpretation is more solid than the previous ones, it runs the risk of forgetting the variety of uses of the expression “we” in Wittgenstein’s texts.
"Noi" e il secondo Wittgenstein
Penco, Carlo
2020-01-01
Abstract
In this paper, after a short introduction on the use of the indexical “we”, I discuss Andronico’s stance on transcendental and empirical interpretations of “we” in the late Wittgenstein. Besides a fundamental agreement, I raise some doubts on her stance of considering “we” as the viewpoint of philosophical analysis. Although her interpretation is more solid than the previous ones, it runs the risk of forgetting the variety of uses of the expression “we” in Wittgenstein’s texts.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Penco-2020-NOI-witt-andronico.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione
240.74 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
240.74 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.