In this paper, after a short introduction on the use of the indexical “we”, I discuss Andronico’s stance on transcendental and empirical interpretations of “we” in the late Wittgenstein. Besides a fundamental agreement, I raise some doubts on her stance of considering “we” as the viewpoint of philosophical analysis. Although her interpretation is more solid than the previous ones, it runs the risk of forgetting the variety of uses of the expression “we” in Wittgenstein’s texts.

"Noi" e il secondo Wittgenstein

Penco, Carlo
2020

Abstract

In this paper, after a short introduction on the use of the indexical “we”, I discuss Andronico’s stance on transcendental and empirical interpretations of “we” in the late Wittgenstein. Besides a fundamental agreement, I raise some doubts on her stance of considering “we” as the viewpoint of philosophical analysis. Although her interpretation is more solid than the previous ones, it runs the risk of forgetting the variety of uses of the expression “we” in Wittgenstein’s texts.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Penco-2020-NOI-witt-andronico.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 240.74 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
240.74 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/1022285
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact