Although a certain interventionism of the Constitutional Court on the punishment’s treatment, it has taken on a mostly «formal» approach to the concept of sanction. However, such a self restraint seems to have found a different reason for weakening in the exogenous events that saw the two European Courts discuss the extent of the ne bis in idem principle, where, albeit according to different perspectives, a «substantial» approach was adopted instead. The present contribution aims, therefore, to investigate this particular phenomenon in order to verify what outcomes (both on the national side, and on the supranational and, more widely, international side) this trilateral dialogue has carried out
Il bis in idem e la difficile definizione della nozione di «sanzione» tra Corte Edu, CGUE e Corte costituzionale
Francesca Bailo
2019-01-01
Abstract
Although a certain interventionism of the Constitutional Court on the punishment’s treatment, it has taken on a mostly «formal» approach to the concept of sanction. However, such a self restraint seems to have found a different reason for weakening in the exogenous events that saw the two European Courts discuss the extent of the ne bis in idem principle, where, albeit according to different perspectives, a «substantial» approach was adopted instead. The present contribution aims, therefore, to investigate this particular phenomenon in order to verify what outcomes (both on the national side, and on the supranational and, more widely, international side) this trilateral dialogue has carried outFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Bailo DPCE 2019-4.pdf
accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione
371.74 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
371.74 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.