BACKGROUND: Recent evidence indicates the possible involvement of adenosine and the purinergic system in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD). The aim of this study is to compare serum uric acid (UA) levels in a large group of BD patients (in mania, depression and euthymia) vs. a control group of patients with different psychiatric disorders. METHODS: 150 BD (SCID-I; DSM-IV) patients were compared to 150 age- and gender-matched subjects with MDD, OCD, or Schizophrenia. Mean serum UA values were compared with the ANOVA, with Bonferroni's post-hoc tests. RESULTS: Mean serum UA levels (5.06 ± 1.45 vs. 4.17 ± 1.05 mg/dL) and rates of hyperuricaemia (30.7% vs. 6.7%) were significantly higher in the bipolar than in the control group. No differences were detected between bipolars in different phases of illness, with all three groups (manic, depressive and euthymic bipolars) showing significantly higher UA levels as compared to controls. No correlations were found between UA levels and YMRS or HAM-D scores. Mean UA levels were also higher in bipolars never exposed to mood stabilizers vs. controls (5.08 ± 1.43 vs. 4.17 ± 1.05 mg/dL), with no differences compared to other bipolars. LIMITATIONS: Our study suffers from the lack of a healthy comparison group; moreover, longitudinal data are missing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides further evidence of a purinergic dysfunction associated with BD, in all phases of the illness. It is possible that increased UA levels are a trait marker of higher vulnerability to bipolar disorder, and are even more increased during mania (mostly in the first manic episode of drug-naïve patients

Increased uric acid levels in bipolar disorder subjects during different phases of illness

AGUGLIA, Andrea;
2015-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence indicates the possible involvement of adenosine and the purinergic system in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD). The aim of this study is to compare serum uric acid (UA) levels in a large group of BD patients (in mania, depression and euthymia) vs. a control group of patients with different psychiatric disorders. METHODS: 150 BD (SCID-I; DSM-IV) patients were compared to 150 age- and gender-matched subjects with MDD, OCD, or Schizophrenia. Mean serum UA values were compared with the ANOVA, with Bonferroni's post-hoc tests. RESULTS: Mean serum UA levels (5.06 ± 1.45 vs. 4.17 ± 1.05 mg/dL) and rates of hyperuricaemia (30.7% vs. 6.7%) were significantly higher in the bipolar than in the control group. No differences were detected between bipolars in different phases of illness, with all three groups (manic, depressive and euthymic bipolars) showing significantly higher UA levels as compared to controls. No correlations were found between UA levels and YMRS or HAM-D scores. Mean UA levels were also higher in bipolars never exposed to mood stabilizers vs. controls (5.08 ± 1.43 vs. 4.17 ± 1.05 mg/dL), with no differences compared to other bipolars. LIMITATIONS: Our study suffers from the lack of a healthy comparison group; moreover, longitudinal data are missing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides further evidence of a purinergic dysfunction associated with BD, in all phases of the illness. It is possible that increased UA levels are a trait marker of higher vulnerability to bipolar disorder, and are even more increased during mania (mostly in the first manic episode of drug-naïve patients
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Increased uric acid levels verione postprint_4aperto.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Dimensione 324.36 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
324.36 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
JAD 2015, Acido urico.pdf

accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 375.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
375.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/1001277
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 56
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 57
social impact