Background and Aim: Recent studies suggested that prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) might be more effective than fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to reduce red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirement after cardiac surgery. The benefits and risks associated with the use of PCC over FFP have been investigated in this study including patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) from a prospective, multicenter registry. Methods: This is a comparative analysis of 416 patients who received postoperatively FFP and 119 patients who received PCC with or without FFP after isolated CABG. Results: Mixed-effects regression analyses adjusted for multiple covariates and participating centers showed that PCC significantly decreased RBC transfusion (67.2% vs. 87.5%, adjusted OR 0.319, 95%CI 0.136-0.752) and platelet transfusion requirements (11.8% vs. 45.2%, adjusted OR 0.238, 95%CI 0.097-0.566) compared with FFP. The PCC cohort received a mean of 2.7±3.7 (median, 2.0, IQR 4) units of RBC and the FFP cohort received a mean of 4.9±6.3 (median, 3.0, IQR 4) units of RBC (adjusted coefficient, -1.926, 95%CI -3.357-0.494). The use of PCC increased the risk of KDIGO acute kidney injury (41.4% vs. 28.2%, adjusted OR 2.300, 1.203-4.400), but not of KDIGO acute kidney injury stage 3 (6.0% vs. 8.0%, OR 0.850, 95%CI 0.258-2.796) when compared with the FFP cohort. Conclusions: These results suggest that the use of PCC compared with FFP may reduce the need of blood transfusion after CABG. In view of the observational nature of this study, these results should

Comparative Analysis of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate and Fresh Frozen Plasma in the Management of Perioperative Bleeding after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

A. Salsano;G. Mariscalco;F. Santini;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Background and Aim: Recent studies suggested that prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) might be more effective than fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to reduce red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirement after cardiac surgery. The benefits and risks associated with the use of PCC over FFP have been investigated in this study including patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) from a prospective, multicenter registry. Methods: This is a comparative analysis of 416 patients who received postoperatively FFP and 119 patients who received PCC with or without FFP after isolated CABG. Results: Mixed-effects regression analyses adjusted for multiple covariates and participating centers showed that PCC significantly decreased RBC transfusion (67.2% vs. 87.5%, adjusted OR 0.319, 95%CI 0.136-0.752) and platelet transfusion requirements (11.8% vs. 45.2%, adjusted OR 0.238, 95%CI 0.097-0.566) compared with FFP. The PCC cohort received a mean of 2.7±3.7 (median, 2.0, IQR 4) units of RBC and the FFP cohort received a mean of 4.9±6.3 (median, 3.0, IQR 4) units of RBC (adjusted coefficient, -1.926, 95%CI -3.357-0.494). The use of PCC increased the risk of KDIGO acute kidney injury (41.4% vs. 28.2%, adjusted OR 2.300, 1.203-4.400), but not of KDIGO acute kidney injury stage 3 (6.0% vs. 8.0%, OR 0.850, 95%CI 0.258-2.796) when compared with the FFP cohort. Conclusions: These results suggest that the use of PCC compared with FFP may reduce the need of blood transfusion after CABG. In view of the observational nature of this study, these results should
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Preview_66cffcfb-3556-4ade-838a-1c2bbd89e366.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Abstract
Dimensione 84.47 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
84.47 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/931093
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact