Three-dimensional geophysical modelling of Kiejo-Mbaka geothermal field, Tanzania

The Kiejo-Mbaka geothermal field is located close to the eastern margin of the Karonga Rift Basin and is part of the Rungwe volcanic province where the EARS splits up into its Western and Eastern branches in southern Tanzania. The area is characterised by a Precambrian gneiss metamorphic basement complex, outcropping along the NW-trending, SW-dipping Mbaka fault. Geothermal manifestations mainly consist of hot springs, flowing close to the Mbaka fault. An integrated geophysical survey was carried out over the Kiejo-Mbaka geothermal field by TGDC (Tanzania Geothermal Development Company), under the supervision of ELC-Electroconsult (Italy). The campaign included 76 Magnetotelluric (MT) and Transient Electromagnetic (TEM) soundings and 133 gravity measurements; a dense station grid allowed for a detailed geophysical 2D and 3D modelling. Two and 3D gravity modelling indicate that the positive residual Bouguer anomaly can be explained by a high density (3 g/cm3) body, constituting the gneiss basement, elongating NW-SE. NE and SW of it, lower density layers (2.5 g/cm3) are observable; the attitude of their bottoms is compatible with the Mbaka fault direction and the Livingstone fault trend (NNW). We found that 3D MT inversion was the only tool giving a reliable resistivity imaging in the Mbaka prospect. From the final 3D MT model, a very resistive body (>2000 Ohm m) deepening toward SE is visible; this body represent the gneiss basement, and the surfaces delimiting it are associated with the Mbaka fault and the Livingstone fault trend. Three conductive zones (less than 10 Ohm m) have been identified: two of them affect the Mbaka fault footwall, NE of the resistive basement, while another one is located beneath the plain, SE of it. This latter zone shows a thickness of about 1 km. It is apparent that the low-density regions well correspond with the high-conductivity zones imaged by the MT 3D inversion. The integrated geophysical interpretation then leads to two possible geological scenarios: these regions can be constituted by (post-rift) sediments (possibly affected by low-T geothermal alteration) or by intensively fractured and low-T altered basement; however, we stress that the possible geothermal alteration is not necessarily related to the present-day geothermal activity, and caution should be taken in result interpretation.