In this paper two different advanced control approaches for a pressurized SOFC hybrid system are investigated and compared against traditional proportional–integral–derivative (PID). Both advanced control methods use model predictive control (MPC): in the first case, the MPC has direct access to the plant manipulated variables, in the second case the MPC operates on the setpoints of PIDs which control the plant. In the second approach the idea is to use MPC at the highest level of the plant control system to optimize the performance of bottoming PIDs, retaining system stability and operator confidence. Two MIMO (multi-input multi-output) controllers were obtained: fuel cell power and cathode inlet temperature are the controlled variables; fuel cell by-pass flow, current and fuel mass flow rate (the utilization factor kept constant) are the manipulated variables. The two advanced control methods were tested and compared against the conventional PID approach using a SOFC hybrid system model. Then, the MPC controller was implemented in the hybrid system emulator test rig developed by the Thermochemical Power Group (TPG) at the University of Genoa. Experimental tests were carried out to compare MPC against classic PID method: load following tests were carried out. Ramping the fuel cell load from 100% to 80% and back, keeping constant the target of the cathode inlet temperature, the MPC controller was able to reduce the mismatch between the actual and the target values of the cathode inlet temperature from 7 K maximum of the PID controller to 3 K maximum, showing more stable behavior in general.

Pressurized SOFC hybrid systems: control system study and experimental verification

LAROSA, LUCA;TRAVERSO, ALBERTO;FERRARI, MARIO LUIGI;ZACCARIA, VALENTINA
2014-01-01

Abstract

In this paper two different advanced control approaches for a pressurized SOFC hybrid system are investigated and compared against traditional proportional–integral–derivative (PID). Both advanced control methods use model predictive control (MPC): in the first case, the MPC has direct access to the plant manipulated variables, in the second case the MPC operates on the setpoints of PIDs which control the plant. In the second approach the idea is to use MPC at the highest level of the plant control system to optimize the performance of bottoming PIDs, retaining system stability and operator confidence. Two MIMO (multi-input multi-output) controllers were obtained: fuel cell power and cathode inlet temperature are the controlled variables; fuel cell by-pass flow, current and fuel mass flow rate (the utilization factor kept constant) are the manipulated variables. The two advanced control methods were tested and compared against the conventional PID approach using a SOFC hybrid system model. Then, the MPC controller was implemented in the hybrid system emulator test rig developed by the Thermochemical Power Group (TPG) at the University of Genoa. Experimental tests were carried out to compare MPC against classic PID method: load following tests were carried out. Ramping the fuel cell load from 100% to 80% and back, keeping constant the target of the cathode inlet temperature, the MPC controller was able to reduce the mismatch between the actual and the target values of the cathode inlet temperature from 7 K maximum of the PID controller to 3 K maximum, showing more stable behavior in general.
2014
9780791845653
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/716776
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact