In this paper, I aim to evaluate whether Davidson’s triangular externalism is or is not affected by one of the most famous objections raised against externalist theories on mental content: the Reductio Argument. According to these critics, combining externalism with certain characteristics of self-knowledge leads to overly strong and highly counterintuitive anti-skeptical consequences, and thus to the refutation of externalism. First of all, I argue that triangular externalism is not affected by the objection raised by the Reductio Argument; secondly, I outline some consequences for the anti-skeptical argument that Davidson hopes to derive from his own theory. My conclusion is that triangular externalism is not an authentic answer to the skeptic about the external world.
Davidson, Self-Knowledge, and Skepticism
AMORETTI, MARIA CRISTINA
2008-01-01
Abstract
In this paper, I aim to evaluate whether Davidson’s triangular externalism is or is not affected by one of the most famous objections raised against externalist theories on mental content: the Reductio Argument. According to these critics, combining externalism with certain characteristics of self-knowledge leads to overly strong and highly counterintuitive anti-skeptical consequences, and thus to the refutation of externalism. First of all, I argue that triangular externalism is not affected by the objection raised by the Reductio Argument; secondly, I outline some consequences for the anti-skeptical argument that Davidson hopes to derive from his own theory. My conclusion is that triangular externalism is not an authentic answer to the skeptic about the external world.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.