We present an ontological framework for the reason-based model of individual preferences introduced by F. Dietrich and C. List. According to this perspective, an agent prefers x to y if and only if the importance of the reasons motivating x outweighs the importance of the reasons motivating y. Firstly, we represent motivating reasons as concepts in Description Logic, to enable a rich ontological theory that provides a clear and shareable semantics of reasons. Secondly, we present a model to express preferences on combinations of reasons. Finally, we discuss how preferences on alternatives depend on preferences on motivating reasons. We present the framework in a knowledge-dependent way, meaning that the ontological background constrains the definable preferences on alternatives and reasons.

An Ontological Modelling of Reason-Based Preferences

Daniele Porello
2023-01-01

Abstract

We present an ontological framework for the reason-based model of individual preferences introduced by F. Dietrich and C. List. According to this perspective, an agent prefers x to y if and only if the importance of the reasons motivating x outweighs the importance of the reasons motivating y. Firstly, we represent motivating reasons as concepts in Description Logic, to enable a rich ontological theory that provides a clear and shareable semantics of reasons. Secondly, we present a model to express preferences on combinations of reasons. Finally, we discuss how preferences on alternatives depend on preferences on motivating reasons. We present the framework in a knowledge-dependent way, meaning that the ontological background constrains the definable preferences on alternatives and reasons.
2023
9783031475450
9783031475467
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/1175097
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact