Dynamic analysis and energy management strategies of micro gas turbine systems integrated with mechanical, electrochemical and thermal energy storage devices

The growing concern related to the rise of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has led to an increase of share of renewable energy sources. Due to their unpredictability and intermittency, new flexible and efficient power systems need to be developed to compensate for this fluctuating power production. In this context, micro gas turbines have high potential for small-scale combined heat and power (CHP) applications considering their fuel flexibility, quick load changes, low maintenance, low vibrations, and high overall efficiency. Furthermore, the combination of micro gas turbines with energy storage systems can further increase the overall system flexibility and the response to rapid load changes. This thesis aims to analyse the integration of micro gas turbines with the following energy storage systems: compressed air energy storage (CAES), chemical energy storage (using hydrogen and ammonia), battery storage, and thermal energy storage. In particular, micro gas turbines integrated with CAES systems and alternative fuels operate in different working conditions compared to their standard conditions. Applications requiring increased mass flow rate at the expander, such as CAES and the use of fuels with low LHV, such as ammonia, can potentially reduce the compressor surge margin. Conversely, sudden composition changes of high LHV fuels, such as hydrogen, can cause temperature peaks, detrimental for the turbine and recuperator life. A validated model of a T100 micro gas turbine is used to analyse transitions between different conditions, identify operational limits and test the control system. Starting from the dynamic constraints defined in the related chapters, in the final part, an optimisation tool for energy management is developed to couple the micro gas turbine with energy storage systems, maximizing the plant profitability and satisfying the local electrical and thermal demands. For the modelling of the CAES system and alternative fuels, the operating constraints obtained from the initial analyses are implemented in the optimisation tool. In addition, a battery and thermal energy storage system are also considered. In the first part, a comprehensive analysis of the T100 combined with a second-generation CAES system showed enhanced efficiency, reduced fuel consumption, reduced thermal power output and increased maximum electrical power output due to the reduction of the rotational speed. The study identified optimal air injection constraints, demonstrating a +3.23% efficiency increase at 80 kW net power with a maximum mass flow rate of 50 g/s. The dynamic analysis exposed potential instabilities issues during air step injections, mitigated by using ramps at a rate of +0.5 (g/s)/s for safe and rapid dynamic mode operation. The second part explored the effects of varying H2-NG and NH3-NG blends on the T100 mGT. Steady-state results showed increased power output with hydrogen or ammonia, notably +6.1 kW for 100% H2 and up to +11.3 kW for 100% NH3. Transient power steps simulations showed surge margin reductions, especially at lower power levels with high concentrations of ammonia, highlighting the need for controlled transitions. Controlled ramps were effective in preventing extreme temperature peaks during fuel composition changes. The final chapter focused on developing an energy scheduler for different plant setups, evaluating four configurations. For a typical day of the month of April of the Savona Campus, the integration of the CAES lead to relative savings of +8.1% and power-to-H2 of +5.3% when surplus electricity was not sold to the grid. Conversely, with the ability to sell excess electricity, CAES and battery energy storage (BES) systems exhibit modest savings of +1.2% and +2.4%, respectively, while the power-to-H2 system failed to provide economic advantages.