Axiom weakening is a novel technique that allows for fine-grained repair of inconsistent ontologies. In a multi-agent setting, integrating ontologies corresponding to multiple agents may lead to inconsistencies. Such inconsistencies can be resolved after the integrated ontology has been built, or their generation can be prevented during ontology construction. We implement and compare these two approaches. First, we study how to repair an inconsistent ontology resulting from a voting-based aggregation of views of heterogeneous agents. Second, we prevent the generation of inconsistencies by let- ting the agents engage in a turn-based rational pro- tocol about the axioms to be added to the integrated ontology. We instantiate the two approaches using real-world ontologies and compare them by mea- suring the levels of satisfaction of the agents w.r.t. the ontology obtained by the two procedures.
Two Approaches to Ontology Aggregation Based on Axiom Weakening
Porello D;
2018-01-01
Abstract
Axiom weakening is a novel technique that allows for fine-grained repair of inconsistent ontologies. In a multi-agent setting, integrating ontologies corresponding to multiple agents may lead to inconsistencies. Such inconsistencies can be resolved after the integrated ontology has been built, or their generation can be prevented during ontology construction. We implement and compare these two approaches. First, we study how to repair an inconsistent ontology resulting from a voting-based aggregation of views of heterogeneous agents. Second, we prevent the generation of inconsistencies by let- ting the agents engage in a turn-based rational pro- tocol about the axioms to be added to the integrated ontology. We instantiate the two approaches using real-world ontologies and compare them by mea- suring the levels of satisfaction of the agents w.r.t. the ontology obtained by the two procedures.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
