Every decentralized state has got the problems about the relationships between the different institutional levels. One kind of relationships can be expressed by the Senate but in some decentralized States the Second Chamber is no longer perceived as an effective mechanism of representation of the regional (or federated) entities. Therefore, the intestate federalism can be preferred to intrastate federalism, increasing the role of government branch as to legislative assemblies. The co-operation among institutional levels gives birth to a tight network of relation between the different levels of government and is substantiated with a variety of involved actors and concrete procedures. To have a classification of these relations, the doctrine referred to institutional and functional cooperation. The first drove to the creation of some organs that gather both state bodies and regional and local ones. The “State-Regions” Conference is a significant example together with the Conferencias sectoriales in Spain or the Joint committee in the U.K. Hereafter our attention will move to the co-operation forms between government levels from which acts and procedures arise. Such acts and procedures are a result of the meeting between the different representatives of the administrations. This helps to speed the administrative process and to improve, then, the public performance quality. For instance we can cite the Austrian öffentlich-rechtliche Verträge In conclusion, I’d like to underline two points: one: there is an increase of intergovernmental relationships in the decentralized States. This trend can be explained with the reason to give the regional level a collective voice in the national policy process, especially, where no regional second chambers exist. The second point is: the institutions of intergovernmental relationships are clearly important for the development of coherent policy but it can reduce the legislative role. The intergovernmental institutions operate in a space between the region and the Member state levels and as the decisions reached are a compromise between executives, neither the member state parliament nor the regional legislature will responsible for the decisions taken. Despite this, they may be obliged to follow these decisions.

The principle of the separation of powers in crisis: The intergovernmental relationships from a comparative perspective

CECCHERINI, ELEONORA
2013-01-01

Abstract

Every decentralized state has got the problems about the relationships between the different institutional levels. One kind of relationships can be expressed by the Senate but in some decentralized States the Second Chamber is no longer perceived as an effective mechanism of representation of the regional (or federated) entities. Therefore, the intestate federalism can be preferred to intrastate federalism, increasing the role of government branch as to legislative assemblies. The co-operation among institutional levels gives birth to a tight network of relation between the different levels of government and is substantiated with a variety of involved actors and concrete procedures. To have a classification of these relations, the doctrine referred to institutional and functional cooperation. The first drove to the creation of some organs that gather both state bodies and regional and local ones. The “State-Regions” Conference is a significant example together with the Conferencias sectoriales in Spain or the Joint committee in the U.K. Hereafter our attention will move to the co-operation forms between government levels from which acts and procedures arise. Such acts and procedures are a result of the meeting between the different representatives of the administrations. This helps to speed the administrative process and to improve, then, the public performance quality. For instance we can cite the Austrian öffentlich-rechtliche Verträge In conclusion, I’d like to underline two points: one: there is an increase of intergovernmental relationships in the decentralized States. This trend can be explained with the reason to give the regional level a collective voice in the national policy process, especially, where no regional second chambers exist. The second point is: the institutions of intergovernmental relationships are clearly important for the development of coherent policy but it can reduce the legislative role. The intergovernmental institutions operate in a space between the region and the Member state levels and as the decisions reached are a compromise between executives, neither the member state parliament nor the regional legislature will responsible for the decisions taken. Despite this, they may be obliged to follow these decisions.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/390575
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact