Different heuristics for the problem of determining stowage plans for containerships, that is the so called Master Bay Plan Problem (MBPP), are compared. The first approach is a tabu search (TS) heuristic and it has been recently presented in literature. Two new solution procedures are proposed in this paper: a fast simple constructive loading heuristic (LH) and an ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm. An extensive computational experimentation performed on both random and real size instances is reported and conclusions on the appropriateness of the tested approaches for the MBPP are drawn.
An experimental comparison of different metaheuristics for the Master Bay Plan Problem
AMBROSINO, DANIELA;ANGHINOLFI, DAVIDE;PAOLUCCI, MASSIMO;SCIOMACHEN, ANNA FRANCA
2010-01-01
Abstract
Different heuristics for the problem of determining stowage plans for containerships, that is the so called Master Bay Plan Problem (MBPP), are compared. The first approach is a tabu search (TS) heuristic and it has been recently presented in literature. Two new solution procedures are proposed in this paper: a fast simple constructive loading heuristic (LH) and an ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm. An extensive computational experimentation performed on both random and real size instances is reported and conclusions on the appropriateness of the tested approaches for the MBPP are drawn.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
festa_2010.pdf
accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione
8.79 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
8.79 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.