Different heuristics for the problem of determining stowage plans for containerships, that is the so called Master Bay Plan Problem (MBPP), are compared. The first approach is a tabu search (TS) heuristic and it has been recently presented in literature. Two new solution procedures are proposed in this paper: a fast simple constructive loading heuristic (LH) and an ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm. An extensive computational experimentation performed on both random and real size instances is reported and conclusions on the appropriateness of the tested approaches for the MBPP are drawn.

An experimental comparison of different metaheuristics for the Master Bay Plan Problem

AMBROSINO, DANIELA;ANGHINOLFI, DAVIDE;PAOLUCCI, MASSIMO;SCIOMACHEN, ANNA FRANCA
2010-01-01

Abstract

Different heuristics for the problem of determining stowage plans for containerships, that is the so called Master Bay Plan Problem (MBPP), are compared. The first approach is a tabu search (TS) heuristic and it has been recently presented in literature. Two new solution procedures are proposed in this paper: a fast simple constructive loading heuristic (LH) and an ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm. An extensive computational experimentation performed on both random and real size instances is reported and conclusions on the appropriateness of the tested approaches for the MBPP are drawn.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
festa_2010.pdf

accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 8.79 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.79 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/252272
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 46
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 33
social impact