Thanks to digital technologies, companies can communicate in real time with their stakeholders through corporate websites and social media profiles. These communication channels may be especially useful when companies are involved in scandals and their licence to operate is threatened. In such cases, companies are expected to disclose information about the scandal by adopting legitimation tactics. Focusing on the recent Dieselgate scandal, this chapter aims at exploring the legitimation tactics employed in digital narratives reported by Volkswagen, Daimler and BMW. A close reading of press releases, Twitter posts, annual reports and sustainability reports published in the aftermath of the scandal is performed to detect the presence of legitimation tactics. Unsurprisingly, Volkswagen is found to adopt a reactive approach when reporting about Dieselgate, diminishing the issue and reassuring its shareholders. Hit by the scandal two years later, Daimler and BMW demonstrate that they had learned the lesson of Volkswagen with more sophisticated tactics, but with two different attitudes. Whereas Daimler is proactive in conveying detailed measures to the benefit of its customers, BMW is more defensive and downplays the scandal. With its findings, this chapter advances knowledge on the role of digital narratives as legitimising tools in times of scandals, thereby advising stakeholders about the techniques that companies employ under extreme circumstances.

Chapter 18: Digital Narrative Reporting and Legitimation Tactics in Dieselgate Time(s)

Giulia Leoni;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Thanks to digital technologies, companies can communicate in real time with their stakeholders through corporate websites and social media profiles. These communication channels may be especially useful when companies are involved in scandals and their licence to operate is threatened. In such cases, companies are expected to disclose information about the scandal by adopting legitimation tactics. Focusing on the recent Dieselgate scandal, this chapter aims at exploring the legitimation tactics employed in digital narratives reported by Volkswagen, Daimler and BMW. A close reading of press releases, Twitter posts, annual reports and sustainability reports published in the aftermath of the scandal is performed to detect the presence of legitimation tactics. Unsurprisingly, Volkswagen is found to adopt a reactive approach when reporting about Dieselgate, diminishing the issue and reassuring its shareholders. Hit by the scandal two years later, Daimler and BMW demonstrate that they had learned the lesson of Volkswagen with more sophisticated tactics, but with two different attitudes. Whereas Daimler is proactive in conveying detailed measures to the benefit of its customers, BMW is more defensive and downplays the scandal. With its findings, this chapter advances knowledge on the role of digital narratives as legitimising tools in times of scandals, thereby advising stakeholders about the techniques that companies employ under extreme circumstances.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Giulia Leoni - ch 18 - Corporate Narrative Reporting - Beyond the Numbers.pdf

accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in versione editoriale
Dimensione 1.01 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.01 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11567/1092633
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact