ABSTRACT: Starting from the case of embryos exchanged in the Pertini’s hospital in Rome, I take in consideration the Answer of the National Committee for the Bioethics and I move some criticism towards affirmations about the possibility to predispose a “bioethics instrument” for an eventual child-exchange after birth. I analyze the order of the Tribunal of Rome and the question of constitutionality proposed and rejected. At the end I propose a distinction between the legal interest to be protected in case of surrogacy and in the case of “heterologous fertilization by mistake” or “surrogacy by mistake”.
Eterologhe “da errore” e salomonici abusi. Commenti a margine della Risposta del Comitato Nazionale di Bioetica e dell’Ordinanza del Tribunale di Roma sul caso dello scambio di embrioni all’ospedale Pertini di Roma.
CAMPODONICO, FRANCESCO
2014-01-01
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Starting from the case of embryos exchanged in the Pertini’s hospital in Rome, I take in consideration the Answer of the National Committee for the Bioethics and I move some criticism towards affirmations about the possibility to predispose a “bioethics instrument” for an eventual child-exchange after birth. I analyze the order of the Tribunal of Rome and the question of constitutionality proposed and rejected. At the end I propose a distinction between the legal interest to be protected in case of surrogacy and in the case of “heterologous fertilization by mistake” or “surrogacy by mistake”.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
