The authors conducted a randomized trial on 16 patients to evaluate intestinal aerobic microfloral changes after prolonged oral treatment with bacampicillin (b.) (16 g/die) or amoxicillin (a.) (2 g/die). The analysis showed a quantitative reduction of isolates in 6 patients: 2 patients were treated with b. while 4 with a. (Odd ratio, O.R. = 3). Mean values of CFU presented as well a more evident reduction in a.-treated patients. From the qualitative point of view, bacteria modifications occurred in one patient treated with b. and 3 with a, (O.R. = 4.2). Bacterial changes, although not statistically significant, were thus greater in patients treated with a. than b.
Assessing modifications of the intestinal bacterial flora in patients on long-term oral treatment with bacampicillin or amoxicillin: a random study. / Gipponi M;Sciutto C;Accornero L;Bonassi S;Raso C;Vignolo C;Cafiero F. - STAMPA. - 4(1985), pp. 214-217.
Scheda prodotto non validato
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Titolo: | Assessing modifications of the intestinal bacterial flora in patients on long-term oral treatment with bacampicillin or amoxicillin: a random study. |
Autori: | |
Data di pubblicazione: | 1985 |
Rivista: | |
Citazione: | Assessing modifications of the intestinal bacterial flora in patients on long-term oral treatment with bacampicillin or amoxicillin: a random study. / Gipponi M;Sciutto C;Accornero L;Bonassi S;Raso C;Vignolo C;Cafiero F. - STAMPA. - 4(1985), pp. 214-217. |
Abstract: | The authors conducted a randomized trial on 16 patients to evaluate intestinal aerobic microfloral changes after prolonged oral treatment with bacampicillin (b.) (16 g/die) or amoxicillin (a.) (2 g/die). The analysis showed a quantitative reduction of isolates in 6 patients: 2 patients were treated with b. while 4 with a. (Odd ratio, O.R. = 3). Mean values of CFU presented as well a more evident reduction in a.-treated patients. From the qualitative point of view, bacteria modifications occurred in one patient treated with b. and 3 with a, (O.R. = 4.2). Bacterial changes, although not statistically significant, were thus greater in patients treated with a. than b. |
Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11567/522412 |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 01.01 - Articolo su rivista |